Search for: "State v Ore"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,674
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am
R (on the application of Toraane and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 23. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
The FCA has stated that serious breaches will be prioritised and that it will act “swiftly and assertively” where necessary. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:19 pm
” ORS 31.730(1) [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
The ET had erred in its approach because it had failed to engage with the question identified in Eweida and Ors v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8; had it done so, it would have concluded that there was a close or direct nexus between her Facebook posts and her protected beliefs. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
In Bostock v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:48 am
Accordingly, in the recent case of Local Authority v S & Ors [2023] EWFC 85, the court reinstated the high threshold for removing the child care from a parent. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 2:37 am
Accordingly, in the recent case of Local Authority v S & Ors [2023] EWFC 85, the court reinstated the high threshold for removing the child care from a parent. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
The part state-owned companies Hikvision and Dahua have been criticised for their links with privacy concerns and human rights abuses in China. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:26 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
Bing AI was more eccentric: Guardian News and Media Ltd & Ors, Re HM Treasury v Ahmed & Ors [2010] UKSC 1 Venables & Anor v News Group Papers Ltd & Ors [2010] EWHC B18 (QB) Ronaldo v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 2710 (QB) Mosley v The United Kingdom (Application no.48009/08) Ferdinand v Mgn Ltd (Rev 2) [2011] EWHC 2454 (QB) It is perhaps difficult to imagine that more than one or two of these cases would… [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:13 am
The arguments In Forstater v CGD Europe & Ors [2021] UKEAT 0105 20 1006, the EAT had declared at [79] that: “in applying Grainger V, tribunals [should] bear in mind that it is only those beliefs that would be an affront to Convention principles in a manner akin to that of pursuing totalitarianism, or advocating Nazism, or espousing violence and hatred of the gravest of forms, that should be capable of being not worthy of respect in a democratic society. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:53 am
Ore. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
Last week in the courts On 9 May 2023, Nicklin J continued to hear the trial in the case of MBR Acres Ltd v Free MBR Beagles and Saini J continued to hear the trial in Packham CBE v Wightman and ors. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm
Section 165(4)(a) states that the ICO must “take appropriate steps to respond to the complaint”, which includes (pursuant to section 165(5)(a)) “investigating the subject matter of the complaint, to the extent appropriate”. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
In a press release, the Met stated that the arrests were for affray, public order offenses, breach of the peace and conspiracy to cause a public nuisance. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:30 am
Josephine Rendall-Neal, Lexology: Belief Discrimination in the UK – An Effective Employer Defense [sic]: on Randall v Trent College Ltd and Ors, which we noted here. [read post]
