Search for: "State v Pore"
Results 61 - 80
of 120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2023, 6:34 pm
Performance data should be customized to the indications for use, including the specific intended patient population (adult vs. pediatric), disease state, conditions of use, and the target anatomical location. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 3:37 am
Locomotively questionable train analogies and a bench skeptical of the petitioner’s position marked Tuesday’s argument in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 9:49 am
Penrod stated that he was `99.99-percent sure we won't find any metadata associated with these files.' U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
”If there were any doubt about the role of the wife as a director, that was done away with by Debelle J in Group 4 Industries Pty Ltd v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:25 pm
In the four-one-four ruling in Yates v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm
Petrova was poring over the applications; she takes this seriously!) [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:26 am
The good faith exception to warrant searches adopted in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:36 am
For some counties, round trip is going to be 10 to 12 hours to testify" for the lab analyst to travel to court.Burns said 42 states and the District are affected by the Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:50 pm
Jonathan Markell and U.S. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 10:23 am
Reuters reports that the United States strongly believes that the killing was ordered by Kim Jong Un. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm
A fertile ground for new libel claims exists and those who enter the fray need to recognise that what they say may end up being pored over by a libel expert. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 8:31 am
Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:20 pm
This case reminds me of the landmark case of Moore v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:25 am
v=yMLZO-sObzQ There’s also a pretty good play, and more parties than you can shake a groove thing at! [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:37 am
As the case of Salazar v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 1:26 pm
(The “endorsement” test is often identified with the church-state opinions of now-retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, and requires courts to pore over a religious practice to see if it identifies the government with a specific faith or denomination.) [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:48 pm
"] From today's decision of the Florida Court of Appeal in Doe v. [read post]
