Search for: "State v. ALIVE Voluntary"
Results 61 - 80
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Justice BhandariThe Supreme Court in State of Uttranchal v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:28 am
Part V will review the legal basis on which the majority rests its authority for the rules, likely to be challenged in court. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:51 am
Last week, in Dixon v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 pm
Winn, et al. (09-987) and Garriott v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
Among claims that the judge refused to keep alive were arguments that state governments as employers should not have to provide the same kind of health insurance for state workers as private companies must for their employees, and that the states make a voluntary choice about whether to participate in a new form of “health insurance exchange” to give individuals more options on coverage. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:15 pm
” [via Findlaw] State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
Confessions are only valid if they are free and voluntary. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:31 pm
s Davis v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:13 pm
In economic literature, this behavior is known as “regulatory capture,” and the current political irony is that this is a long-time conservative critique of the regulatory state…. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:25 am
(Her husband was still alive at the time.) [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 10:31 pm
That same populist streak has kept judicial elections alive (in at least some form) in 38 states. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 1:14 am
The opinion in SEC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 9:22 am
Kaplan v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
He died 3 days later of the injuries at the age of 47. * 1599: Nanda Bayin, a Burman king, reportedly laughed to death when informed, by a visiting Italian merchant, that “Venice was a free state without a king. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
United States Immigration and Nationality Act Voluntary Departure: Dada v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Mukasey, No. 05-4448 Petition for review of a decision denying petitioner asylum and related relief, and finding that he was removable due to a prior state conviction for possession of a controlled substance, is denied where a remand was unnecessary because petitioner's challenge to the state court conviction constituted an impermissible collateral attack, and he presented no other claims that would entitle him to relief. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:24 am
Arthur v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
Justice Alito writes for the majority plurality in Hein v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:25 pm
Yesterday's oral argument in Gentry v. [read post]
