Search for: "State v. Accord"
Results 61 - 80
of 49,348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2022, 7:17 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
The Case of the Day is United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:39 am
Rahman and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Case C-83/11; [2012] WLR (D) 259 “Member states of the EU were not required to grant every application for entry or residence submitted by family members of a Union citizen who did not fall under the definition in article 2(2) of Parliament and Council Directive 2004/38/EC of 29 April 2004 , even if they showed, in accordance with article 10(2), that they were dependants of… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:57 am
In Marrero v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:46 am
Facts In State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
After scrutinizing the United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 11:12 am
United States, follows an earlier decision striking down DOMA in the First Circuit, Massachusetts v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
In Blockburger v United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
This post concludes and summarizes our coverage of the case United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:29 am
Next Monday the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:25 am
Section 6 – Emergency Assistance The Artemis Accords echo the language of not just the Outer Space Treaty, and particularly Article V, but also the 1968 Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space (known as the Rescue and Return Agreement), which in Article II stipulates that states must take all possible steps to rescue the personnel of a spacecraft and render all necessary assistance. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:39 pm
According to Mr. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:03 am
The Court granted the State's petition for review without oral argument in this Hays County assault case on the following issue: Arevalo v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 2:36 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Czop and another: (Joined Cases C-147/11 and C-148/11); [2012] WLR (D) 264 “Article 12 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community conferred on the person who was the primary carer of a migrant worker’s or former migrant worker’s child who was attending educational courses in the host member state a right of residence in that state,… [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:36 pm
The following are the most important orders given by the Justices Sudershan Reddy and Surinder Singh Nijjar of the Supreme Court in the case of Nandini Sundar v State of Chattisgarh (2011):1. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:20 am
The Case of the Day, United States v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:39 am
" United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
The majority found that Part V of the 1997 Act was not in accordance with the law. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
” Richardson, 308 N.C. at 477, 302 S.E.2d at 803; accord State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
The Sixth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
