Search for: "State v. Arden"
Results 61 - 80
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
Since he was aged 19, in principle AP qualified for leave to remain under rule 276ADE(1)(v) and it was thus possible to dispose of the appeal by agreement failing which it fell to be considered in accordance with the law stated in the court’s judgment without passing an order. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:36 pm
(Awuah v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 12:21 am
On 29 April 2020, the UK Supreme Court ruled in R (on the application of Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd & Anor) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2020] UKSC 16 that the Secretary of State’s guidance prohibiting the local authorities who administer the local government pension scheme from making investments contrary to UK foreign or UK defence policy was unlawful as it did not fall within the power conferred by Parliament on the… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:41 am
(Marcoux v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
Even since McCann v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
Even since McCann v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
The state appellate court upheld dismissal of allegations that the FCC licensees hoarded or warehoused licenses and made misrepresentations to the FCC in order to retain licenses.Complaining licensees asked (1) whether any or all state-law claims for damages, arising out of fraud, tortious interference with contractual relations and unfair competition, which are in some way associated with an FCC-issued license, are state “regulation” of rates and market entry;… [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:36 pm
Elizabeth Arden (Complaintsboard.com), No. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:39 pm
“Owner” or BusinessRelying on Redevelopment Agency v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:53 pm
”Cleaning Business v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
”He referred to NCAA v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:57 pm
LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
The Court of Appeal similarly accepted the evidence noting that there had been no application to challenge the evidence of the Secretary of State: see [2013] EWCA Civ 199 at [70] (per Arden LJ). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
(CCH Trade Regulation Reporter ¶50,982); and U.S. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Because “benefits tourism” and the burden on the state must be reduced, like Arden LJ it was “impossible” for Lord Carnwath to hold that the objectives underpinning the regulations fell outside the wide margin of discretion allowed to national governments in this field. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:11 am
Intengan v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
The DJ rejected both submissions, but stated a case for the High Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
The DJ rejected both submissions, but stated a case for the High Court. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:18 pm
And that must be how the Court felt in Sanneh v SSWP and others [2015] EWCA Civ 49, which concerns the eligibility rules for Zambrano carers of a raft of social assistance benefits. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 8:37 am
The case is Morgan v. [read post]
