Search for: "State v. Automatic Merchandisers"
Results 61 - 80
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:11 am
Recently, Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, in the case of Burton v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:50 am
That decision offered an interesting discussion of choice of law, and of the notion of commonality after Dukes v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:33 am
Buetow v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:00 am
The State requested three weeks to analyze the machines, and the justice court ordered the State to file charges against the Moores by November 8, 200, or return the machines. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:23 pm
Tire Corp. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
In Booth Family Trust v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:07 pm
Long ago, the court held in Singer v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
United States Cellular Corporation (N.D. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
Div. 1981); State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 10:22 am
Long ago, the court in Singer v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:22 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:06 am
Currently, California Dental Association v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
Cicle v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Oct. 6, 2009), Chase appealed from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri denying its motion to compel arbitration of claims plaintiff Virginia Cicle brought in a class-action lawsuit, in which she alleged that Chase (1) imposed illegal penalties and (2) committed an unfair merchandising practice under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA) when it increased the interest rate on her credit card without giving her notice. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 10:43 pm
" Overwaitea Food Group Limited Partnership v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:24 am
" U.S. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
