Search for: "State v. BNSF Railway Co."
Results 61 - 80
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2017, 7:40 am
BNSF Railway Co. and its effect on litigation challenging BIA’s new rights-of-way regulations. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Finally, employers should avoid shifting pre-hire medical examination costs onto prospective applicants and employees in order to comply with EEOC v BNSF Railway Co., 902 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2018), a more recent Ninth Circuit opinion relating to disability. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:09 am
The plaintiff, Melvin Morriss, was offered a job with BNSF Railway. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
Tuesday morning’s argument in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 10:51 am
Martinez, et al v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 8:07 am
However, their claims for benefits under ERISA were dismissed with prejudice because they involved a dispute over the interpretation and application of the terms of a collectively bargained health plan, which was subject to arbitration under the Railway Labor Act (Hall v BNSF Railway Co, September 22, 2014, Martinez, R). [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
The 10 issues to watch are: Offshore wind power generation Renewable energy incentive programs Hydraulic fracturing regulation Aggregation Greenhouse gas litigation California's cap-and-trade program California's Green Chemistry program New mercury standards for coal and oil-burning power plants Fallout from CERCLA decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:42 pm
Railroads In BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:10 am
BNSF Railway Co., August 25, 2017, Feinerman, G.). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 3:35 pm
BNSF Railway Co., resulted in a $228 million verdict against the defendant. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:39 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:42 am
Bauman (in which Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion and whose principles were reaffirmed as recently as last month in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:18 am
Wisconsin Central and the two other petitioners, all wholly owned subsidiaries of Canadian National Railway Co., have been issuing stock options to their employees since the mid-1990s. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:44 am
BNSF Railway Company[2] was the first fully litigated case against an employer for violating BIPA, in the wake of massive settlements involving tech companies including Facebook ($650 million)[3], Google ($100 million)[4], TikTok ($92 million)[5], and Snapchat ($35 million).[6] Meanwhile, the Illinois Supreme Court in West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:37 am
Sec. 1630.2(h)(1) (BNSF Railway Co v Feit, July 6, 2012). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Supreme Court’s Bauman opinion was a game changer, and after the false state of Bristol-Myers Squibb, we were pleased with the California Court of Appeal’s opinion in BNSF Railway v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:11 am
BNSF Railway Co. (10th Cir. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:59 am
BNSF Railway Co. was the twentieth-largest DFW-area judgment rendered in 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:56 pm
Sec. 1630.2(h)(1) (BNSF Railway Co v Feit, July 6, 2012, Baker, B). [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:31 pm
BNSF Railway Co., employees filed a Title VII claim due to the employer’s failure to cover same-sex spouses under its health plan. [read post]
