Search for: "State v. BNSF Railway Co." Results 61 - 80 of 109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-309). [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am by Kate Howard
Issue: Whether the filing of a putative class action serves, under American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:32 am by Steven Cohen
BNSF Railway Company – United States District Court – District of Nebraska – March 29th, 2016 – In this case, filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act, the defendant has filed a motion to exclude the testimony of Alan Blackwell (railroad expert witness). [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:31 pm by Howard Bye-Torre and Claire Rowland
BNSF Railway Co., employees filed a Title VII claim due to the employer’s failure to cover same-sex spouses under its health plan. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
  The Supreme Court’s Bauman opinion was a game changer, and after the false state of Bristol-Myers Squibb, we were pleased with the California Court of Appeal’s opinion in BNSF Railway v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 8:07 am by Joy Waltemath
However, their claims for benefits under ERISA were dismissed with prejudice because they involved a dispute over the interpretation and application of the terms of a collectively bargained health plan, which was subject to arbitration under the Railway Labor Act (Hall v BNSF Railway Co, September 22, 2014, Martinez, R). [read post]