Search for: "State v. BOMBER"
Results 61 - 80
of 264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
The case is Jesner v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
The case is Jesner v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
” In addition to discussing what it would look like to design and manufacture such weapons, Weaver also points to the ways in which drug cartels have begun to produce armed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and the Islamic State has begun to adapt off-the-shelf drones into bombers. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:35 pm
Earlier this month, the Second Circuit issued a decision in Linde v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:00 am
Consider, for instance, Darshan-Leitner’s most prominent (if temporary) legal victory: Sokolow v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:53 am
Matthew Kahn posted the criminal complaint against attempted New York suicide bomber Akayad Ullah. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm
Louisiana and Roper v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
Justice Scalia’s opinion states: “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:20 am
Kahn posted the government’s reply brief in ACLU v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 10:22 am
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson made an unannounced visit to Afghanistan, the AP reported. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 12:01 pm
Fisher for petitioners (Art Lien) The plaintiffs in Jesner v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:27 am
The post State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 7:19 am
In Sosa v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am
A D.C. federal district court judge ruled yesterday in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
Last week at the Guantanamo military commissions, proceedings resumed in the case of alleged USS Cole bomber Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 9:05 am
By giving a “bomber’s veto” — a version of the heckler’s veto, in which the police shut down a speaker because thugs are threatening violence against him — to the Islamic State and its supporters, it encourages them. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
In Sosa v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
The judgment comes as a surprise, as the previously established UK case law had over time firmly done away with the idea of ‘pith and marrow’ infringement, culminating in the seminal House of Lords judgment in Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel [2004] UKHL 46. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
The judgment comes as a surprise, as the previously established UK case law had over time firmly done away with the idea of ‘pith and marrow’ infringement, culminating in the seminal House of Lords judgment in Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel [2004] UKHL 46. [read post]
