Search for: "State v. Bakke"
Results 61 - 80
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2023, 4:27 pm
” In Rice v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
United States OT 2016 – Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
United States OT 2016 – Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 3:20 am
” Six days after Friday’s announcement that the Court will review a challenge to a Texas law imposing additional regulations on abortion clinics in that state, coverage of and commentary on Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) (allowing race to be one of several factors to be considered as criteria in college admission, but prohibiting the use of specific quotas). [9] See, e.g., Gratz v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 2:25 am
In late June, the United States SC decided Seattle School Dsitrict, a judgment that has partially overruled Brown v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
” Twenty-five years later, in Grutter v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
The most recent affirmative action case before the Supreme Court of the United States is Fisher v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
United States in 2016. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
Bakke (1978). [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
In Bostock v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:48 pm
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 289-90 (1978), stating that “‘[t]he guarantee of equal protection cannot mean one thing when applied to one individual and something else when applied to a person of another color. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 1:21 pm
The second installment of Fisher v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
Image by Peat Bakke [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
This contribution to our symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 299 (1978). [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 299 (1978). [read post]
15 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
Casey’s “undue burden” test comes to mind, as does Bakke’s quotas-are-okay-so-long-as-you-lie-about-them regime. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
