Search for: "State v. Baxter"
Results 61 - 80
of 517
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
Texas and United States v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
(relisted after the May 21 conference) Baxter v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:11 am
Credit: Reuters In the United States, police violence frequently dominates the news cycle. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:07 pm
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Wearing, carrying, or transporting handgun in vehicle Baxter Mitchell, appellant, was arrested and charged with multiple gun-related offenses after several firearms were discovered in the trunk of a vehicle owned by another individual. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 12:26 pm
Mills and Others Baxter v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
Dose IQ Software Version 9.0.x has been recalled by Baxter Healthcare because of software defects. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 10:24 am
(citing Baxter Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
There is a long history of pirate websites locating themselves outside of the United States but marketing themselves to U.S. users in a deceptive manner that makes it difficult for consumers, including both consumers and brands, to distinguish an illegitimate site from a legitimate one. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:52 pm
Electronic Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:05 am
[Eric Baxter on Ricks v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:42 pm
In Stone v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:25 pm
”); State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
The Emerson defendants and the Greenberg Traurig defendants established that this action was without any reasonable basis in law or fact and that the primary purpose in commencing this action was to harass them (see Baxter v Javier, 109 AD3d 493, 495; Zysk v Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, LLP, 53 AD3d 482, 483; Nyitray v New York Athletic Club in City of N.Y., 274 AD2d 326, 327; Matter of Entertainment Partners Group v Davis, 198 AD2d 63,… [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:41 am
More on The Boise Case: A piece by Anchorage attorney Lee Baxter in the Alaska Landmine, discusses at length the petition by Boise, Idaho to have SCOTUS review the Ninth Circuit's 2018 Martin v. [read post]