Search for: "State v. Books" Results 61 - 80 of 16,009
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm by Frank Cranmer
Thibaut Lesseliers, Strasbourg Observers: Föderation der Aleviten Gemeinden in Österreich v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  The Book Prize went to Joanna Schwartz for Shielded: How The Police Became Untouchable. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:12 pm
This is merely one  small part of a much larger effort, through the organs and mechanisms of law and international institutions, to develop a play book for the management of States. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am by itars sis
Thus, in the span of a couple of years (2018 to 2020), the US company has gone from disclosing[11] the use of BooksCorpus[12] (a dataset of 7,000 self-published books retrieved from smashwords.com, which are largely protected under copyright)[13] for the training of GPT-1 (released in June 2018), to indicating the use of several vaguely labeled datasets to train GPT-3 (released in July 2020), including two internet-based books corpora (Books1 and Books2).[14] Although the content… [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm by David Pozen
Schedule I of the CSA imposes a complete criminal ban; schedules II through V allow drugs to be prescribed under certain conditions. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  This provision, and not Civil Service Law § 72, applies under the circumstances because a more general statute generally must yield to a more specific statute (Matter of Zelazny Family Enters., LLC v Town of Shelby, 180 AD3d 45, 48 [4th Dept 2019]; McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 397). [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  This provision, and not Civil Service Law § 72, applies under the circumstances because a more general statute generally must yield to a more specific statute (Matter of Zelazny Family Enters., LLC v Town of Shelby, 180 AD3d 45, 48 [4th Dept 2019]; McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 397). [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]