Search for: "State v. Brand" Results 61 - 80 of 6,481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am by Satya Marar
Supreme Court confirmed the legality of Amex’s restraints on steering customers in the 2018 American Express v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am by Marcel Pemsel
The CJEU answered the question in the affirmative but the court seized will only have jurisdiction to decide on the damage caused in the territory of the Member State to which it belongs. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
” Something tells me that NPR editors would not have found Baker’s brand of advocacy to be “dignified. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm by Eleonora Rosati
This year, the keynote speech will be delivered by Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer at the UKIPO.Starting at 2 pm and finishing with drinks and canapes from 6:15pm at Simmons’ offices in Citypoint, Moorgate, the full line up is below:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome (Darren Meale)14:40-15:40 – Panel 1 – “When you do nothing or you can’t do anything – acquiescence and other modern challenges in trade mark… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Brand, and Houston Putnam Lowry, eds., Interim Measures in the United States in Aid of Arbitration (2022). 76. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 5:13 pm by Jeanne Huang
Vázquez will focus on developments in the United States, including such recent decisions as Mallory v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A variant of separating the mark from the brand; not seeing it in all categories, and we may have a world in which some marks—maybe the 1%--are not divided from brands but the others are. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]