Search for: "State v. C. D. H."
Results 61 - 80
of 2,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2010, 7:35 am
Except insofar as they allege ineffective assistance of counsel, claims 1 (subclaims A and B), 6 (subclaims C.1-C.3, and D), 9, 10 (subclaims A-H), 11, 12 (subclaims B-C), 14, and 15 are denied on the ground that these claims were raised and rejected on appeal. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:03 pm
In Díaz-Alarcón v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 1:57 pm
§§ 1401(h) and 1467; United States v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:35 pm
I&D Memo at 10– 11; see 19 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
The State dismissed one of the counts on 4 May 2017, leaving Defendant charged with two Class C and one Class H counts of felony embezzlement. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:28 am
H-D Michigan, LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:28 pm
Candice Miller (R-MI10): HR 1117 IH 112th CONGRESS 1st Session H. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 9:01 pm
H. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
Boumediene v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
Barton Gordon (D-TN6): HR 5781 IH 111th CONGRESS 2d Session H. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:52 am
As poignantly stated by the Seventh Circuit in Howard v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 12:35 pm
Referring to United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:59 pm
By J Lokulo-Sodipe & A Osuntogun The Sexual Orientation of a Parent as a Factor when Considering Care By C Feldhaus & C van den Heeve A Human Rights-Based Approach to Poverty Reduction: The Role of the Right of Access to Medicine as an Element of the Right of Access to Health Care By BZ Straus & D Horsten The Impact of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 on the Enforcement of a Mortgage Bond: Sebola v Standard Bank of South … [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:06 am
Article 8 provides the right to respect for private and family life; b) Future disclosures were unlawful for the same reasons; c) The proposed regime relating to H and L’s personal assistants was unlawful; d) Making direct payments to the personal assistants was unlawful and ultra vires (meaning outside the powers of the authority). [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 9:46 pm
Häupl - the AG opinesThe IPKat's incredibly productive and enthusiastic friend Tibor Gold has given him a clue concerning the recent Opinion of Advocate-General Dámaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer in Case C-246/05 Armin Häupl v Lidl Stiftung & Co. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
The compensation amount under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) remains unchanged at $215,000.The Code provides that the $1,000,000,000 threshold used to determine whether a multiemployer plan is a systematically important plan under section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(aa) is adjusted using the cost-of-living adjustment provided under Section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(bb). [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
Y & H Corp. (2006) 546 U.S. 500, 510; Eberhart v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
C resigned her employment.Lake County Bar Association v. [read post]
