Search for: "State v. C. G. B."
Results 61 - 80
of 2,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
C & G of Groton, Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:02 am
In particular, Section 619(c)(2) ensures that the new investment restrictions under Section 619(d)(1)(G)(iii) and Section 619(d)(4), including the numerical limitations under section 619(d)(4)(B)(ii), will only apply to a banking entity at the end of the period that is 2 years after the section’s effective date. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
’ Therefore, the panel and board found that Mismas's alcohol dependency qualified as a mitigating factor pursuant to [Rules and Regulations] 10(B)(2)(g).Lake County Bar Association v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
In a situation where a PCT application is jointly filed by parties A and B, (i) designating party A for one or more designated States and party B for one or more other designated States, and (ii) claiming priority from an earlier patent application designating party A as the applicant, the joint filing implies an agreement between parties A and B allowing party B to rely on the priority, unless there are substantial factual indications to… [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:01 am
FRCP 26(c)(1)(B). [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:12 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 3:41 pm
As a starting point, Cigar Association of America v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 1:29 pm
Federal Agencies Annex IV: First Cycle UPR Recommendations Supported in Whole or in Part by the United States Annex V: U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:23 am
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am
No conclusion can, however, be drawn from G 9/91 or G 10/91 on the required content or quality of the arguments in the statement under Rule 55(c) EPC 1973 or the written reasoned statement according to Article 99 EPC 1973 or Rule 76(1) EPC.7. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Defense Attorneys: Martin G. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 2:35 pm
§ § 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) under Begay v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
§ 1010.820(g)(2). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:17 pm
(Page 20) G. [read post]
20 May 2021, 12:07 pm
G. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:24 pm
States Too Cautious? [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:09 pm
Furthermore, the rebuttable presumption will only exist with respect to an application that satisfies the conditions set forth in 37 CFR 1.78(f)(2)(i) and also has a filing date on or after this new effective date.The provisions of 37 CFR 1.17(f), 1.26(a) and (b), 1.52(d)(2), 1.53(b) and (c)(4), 1.75(b) and (c), 1.76(b)(5), 1.78, 1.104(a)(1) and (b), 1.110, 1.114(a) and (d), 1.136(a)(1), 1.142(a), 1.145, 1.495(g), and… [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:32 am
VitalGo, Inc. v. [read post]
