Search for: "State v. C. N."
Results 61 - 80
of 6,421
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm
Service out under the ‘appropriate court’ ground Cheong Jun Yoong v Three Arrows Capital[1] involved service out of jurisdiction pursuant to the ‘appropriate court’ ground in Order 8 rule 1(1). [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
First, paraquat is closely regulated for agricultural use in the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:04 pm
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 239, n. 17 (1988). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The Court derived the test’s first prong from “the bedrock requirement that ‘the conduct allegedly causing the deprivation of a federal right be fairly attributable to the State,’” asserting that “[a]n act is not attributable to a State unless it is traceable to the State’s power or authority. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
For more information on SEC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
S. 1301, 1303 (2012) (ROBERTS, C. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:03 am
C. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
Bar & Tavern Ass'n v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm
See Breona C. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:57 am
I Dig Texas, LLC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
July 19, 2023); Oce N. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
” Perkins v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:27 am
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
