Search for: "State v. Caruso" Results 61 - 80 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "In opposition, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the Horn and Sager defendants committed malpractice by allegedly not calling the plaintiffs CPA as a witness, by advising him to enter into a modification of his March 12, 1999 child custody stipulation, or by failing to move to disqualify his former wife’s counsel (see generally Waggoner v Caruso, 14 NY3cl 874, 903 NYS2d 333 [2010]; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 648 NYS2d 871 [1996]). [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Caruso Issue: Whether a plaintiff in a 42 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:08 am by PaulKostro
Div. 2001), certif. denied, 171 N.J. 445 (2002); the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:41-1 to -6.2., Caruso v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1 51 Dept2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:12 am
City of New York, 182 A.D.2d 469, Matter of Caruso v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 1:38 am by Söğüt Atilla
PatentsGif by Riana HarveyKatfriend Federico Caruso (SIB LEX) discussed a recent ruling by the Munich Local Division of the Unified Patent Court in Syngenta v Sumi Agro. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"The court erred in finding that plaintiff failed to state a cause of action for legal [*2]malpractice as against Fogarty. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
” In preparation for oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Becerra (2018) (dealing with compelled speech regarding abortion), and Janus v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 5:24 am by Jocelyn Bosse
"The Munich Local Division of the Unified Patent Court (‘the Court’) has ruled in Syngenta v. [read post]