Search for: "State v. Catchings" Results 61 - 80 of 3,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2019, 6:57 am by Samuel Cohen
The Court stated that it was prepared to give additional time to these third parties to identify for redaction any specific text which they considered to be seriously prejudicial. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:58 am by Walter Olson
Greg Abbott and Rob Natelson for the American Legislative Exchange Council, have been promoting the idea of getting two-thirds of the states to call for an Article V convention to propose amendments to the U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
And would could be a more appropriate item to catch up on than the Catch-up case itself, ITV Broadcasting & others v TvCatchup. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:42 pm by Brandy Robinson, EDMI
The Sixth Circuit removed all doubt in Ballinger v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 1:00 am by admin
Depending on your budget, you might consider having a 2nd expert on tap anyway but too much depends on the relative qualifications of the 2nd expert v. the 1st expert v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 1:41 am
Therefore if a mark lacks distinctive character in all Member States, the mark can only be registered if it has acquired distinctive character in the whole of the European Union (Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM, C‑98/11 P, EU:C:2012:307, [61] and [63]).It does not necessarily follow that distinctive character needs to be proven in each Member State. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 6:03 pm
And you filed an affirmative asylum claim within a year of coming to the United States (i.e., the DHS didn't catch you).Plus you've got Judge Reinhardt on the panel, and he writes the opinion.In such a setting, you're going to be granted asylum. [read post]