Search for: "State v. Cheek" Results 61 - 80 of 383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm by Orin Kerr
After charges were formally filed, Maryland state officials collected a sample of his DNA by means of a swab of the inside of his cheek. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:09 am
In a recent post, Mike Dorf (tongue firmly in self-referential cheek) announced "Dorf's Law," which "states that courts do not provide a remedy for really really big constitutional problems where doing so would create chaos. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
Using state law, they swabbed King's cheek to get a DNA sample, and then submitted the sample to the federal DNA database to see if there were any matches. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In Woodward v Grice [2017] EWHC 1292 (QB) the High Court considered the appropriate level of damages to award against a fan of the club for libellous statements made on an online forum. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:51 am by Amy Howe
” More commentary on Friedrichs v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
As for the cheek swab, you may view it as a de minimis intrusion that pales in comparison to state mandates that clearly-innocent children receive, in the name of public health, much more invasive, risky, and repeated vaccination shots. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm by Lyle Denniston
If anything, the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Professor Madison, however, suspects an intentional end-run around reverse engineering fair use law by intentionally asserting only state-law contract claims, copying the proceedings in Bowers v. [read post]