Search for: "State v. Constable" Results 61 - 80 of 513
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was handed down by Dame Sharp, Simler LJ and Haddon-Cave LJ in Harry Miller -v- (1) The College of Policing (2) The Chief Constable of Humberside [2021] EWCA Civ 1926 on Monday 20 December 2021. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 3:44 pm by Michael
Now with the writ of habeas corpus if there’s a danger that the child may be moving out of the state, a parent or a non-parent has stated that they’re going to another region you can file with the writ of habeas corpus a writ of attachment the writ of attachment is something that if the court issues it will command a sheriff or constable to take immediate possession of the child and deliver the child to the court or person or agency designated by the court. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
The UK Government has relaunched the campaign to overhaul the Human Rights Act 1998 in an attempt to counter what Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab has called “wokery and political correctness. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:26 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Furthermore, the Chief Constable did not create a legitimate expectation that the PSNI would undertake an investigation. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
On 15 November 2021 judgment in Mueen-Udin v Secretary of State for the Home Department was handed down by Nicol J. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
However, this still comprised part of the factual matrix of the case, and the judge stated, [55] Constable Letkeman’s act of causing this first collision was dangerous under all the circumstances and a marked departure from the standard expected. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Court stated in Vancouver (City) v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2020] 1 WLR 5037 The UK Court of Appeal’s finding that the South Wales Police Force’s use of facial recognition was unlawful. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The first, Henderson v Chief Constable of Fife Police (only available on Westlaw), she argued was related to the issue of liberty and the limits of police authority, not privacy. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 11 August 2020 the ICO released a statement on the Court of Appeal judgment  in R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058)  stating that “we welcome the Court of Appeal’s judgment that provides clarification on the police use of live facial recognition technology in public places. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
In today’s case (Littlejohn v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On foot of an ICO, the person was taken into custody and had to be released within 28 days, unless the Chief Constable referred the matter to the Commissioner, who had the power to make a detention order if satisfied that the person was involved in terrorism. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:03 am by Sherin and Lodgen
Indeed, no sheriff, constable or any other person may enforce a non-essential eviction of a residential or small business premises unit during the moratorium. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:04 pm by Giles Peaker
Del Rio Sanchez v Simple Properties Management Limited. [read post]