Search for: "State v. Conte"
Results 61 - 80
of 548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 4:12 am
He is being held without bail at the Joseph V. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:29 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
As the Court of Appeals stated in People v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:18 pm
In Del Gatto v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 1:11 pm
Levine, is that there may now be less incentive to expand the common-law liabilty of pioneer manufacturers in generic drug cases - something we've discussed in posts that readers can find under the "product identification" "generic drug" and "Conte" labels in the right-hand margin of the blog.In Schrock v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
As held in People v Lewis, People v Ventimiglia, People v Santarelli and People v Allweiss, it is elementary that evidence of a defendant's prior criminal or immoral conduct is inadmissible if it cannot logically be linked to some specific material issue in the case. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
USC debacle, and until today, missed the Court of Appeal's decision in Conte v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:46 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
2 Aug 2006, 7:47 am
I have argued in an earlier post that the secrecy of information relevant to a civil or criminal court case creates serious problems under Article 6 ECHR and/or Article 14 ICCPR, but that it could potentially be justified if all possible steps short of disclosure are taken in order to alleviate the consequences for any trial of – reasonably ordered – classifications of information.I return to this because the English Court of Appeal has yesterday (again) spoken on the issue, reviewing a… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Glaxo relied on a couple of federal cases that had rejected Conte: (1) Moretti v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien, 614 F3d 638 (7th Cir 2010)… [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 3:38 pm
Relying on State v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 2:49 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 10:11 pm
According to the Colorado Civil Justice League, the decision by the state’s high court last fall in Volunteers of America v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 7:35 pm
Judge Dismisses Piracy Charges(Julian Ku, Opinio Juris) How to Define Piracy (Cont'd): A Critique of U.S. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
General Motors Corp., 542 F.2d 445, 452-53 (7th Cir. 1976); United States v. [read post]
