Search for: "State v. Cote"
Results 61 - 80
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2017, 10:02 am
Chevron Corp. and Doe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Justice Cote strongly disagreed (para 83). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 4:25 am
Justice Cote’s dissent could be seen as a covert attempt to eliminate this PCF. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
Cote, 513 A.2d 341 (N.H. 1986); Karlsons v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 11:32 am
In its decision in Nevsun Resources Ltd v Araya, 2020 SCC 5, the Supreme Court of Canada has held (by a 7-2 decision) that the act of state doctrine is not part of Canadian law (para. 59) and so does not preclude any of the claims. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:23 am
Cote U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
JPM for pre-BK enhancement of position http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Lehman-BK-SDNY-Peck-4-19-12.pdf … B-SDNY's Peck,J. in Lehman v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:41 am
State court or Federal court? [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:54 pm
Cote — a case I discussed back in 2008 here. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Weighing the Public Interest In Pointes Protection, the companion case to Bent, Cote J. states that the public interest weighing exercise may include indicia tethered to the text of the statute and considerations contemplated by the Legislature. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 7:43 am
Justice Cote, joined by Justices Brown and Rowe, stated that “consideration of such an undertaking would allow a wealthy plaintiff to sway the forum non conveniens analysis, which would be inimical to the foundational principles of fairness and efficiency underlying this doctrine” (para 66). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:33 pm
CAAF also granted review in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:39 am
(v) Content Context is king. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am
As they pointed out, just a few years earlier, in Kazemi Estate v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:24 am
Cote v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:27 am
Cote, defendants-appellees
U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:00 am
The case is Manno v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:00 am
Denise Cote). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
In December 2013, the Ninth Circuit allowed the plaintiffs to amend their complaints against Nestle to argue whether their claims against Nestle, Cargill, and Archer Daniels Midland in connection with their operations in Cote d’Ivoire “touch and concern” the United States. [read post]
