Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 61 - 80 of 4,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2009, 10:52 am
Division I and Division II of the Washington State Court of Appeals both issued decisions in favor of local governments seeking to comply with the Public Records Act (PRA). [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" This interpretation, said the Appellate Division, "comports with the plain language of the provision as well as its legislative history," citing Matter of Albany Law School v New York State Off. of Mental Retardation and Dev. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" This interpretation, said the Appellate Division, "comports with the plain language of the provision as well as its legislative history," citing Matter of Albany Law School v New York State Off. of Mental Retardation and Dev. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:41 am
Several months ago, I posted about a local court of appeal decision, Cuccia v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 8:47 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
  The Appellate Division of New Jersey’s Superior Court subsequently held that such a bar applied to claims of retaliation raised in disciplinary appeals under both CEPA and New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (known as the “LAD”). [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 11:08 am
The California Court of Appeal (First District, Division 1) issued this unpublished opinion, affirming a trial court order denying a defendant's special motion to strike the plaintiff's complaint under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (the "anti-SLAPP" statute).I won't delve into the anti-SLAPP aspects of this opinion, which are beyond the scope of this blog. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
MACNEIL, et al., Defendants - Appellees, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division (District Court Docket No. 3:08-cv-507-J-33) DEATH WARRANT CASE EXECUTION SCHEDULED FOR JULY 1, 2008 REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT Charles E. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:39 pm
Anzalone The Appellate Division of the Superior Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow in two eminent domain cases, City of Long Branch v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
The California Court of Appeal (Second District, Division Three) issued this unpublished opinion today, affirming a $2 million punitive damages award. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:51 am by Joy Waltemath
The court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that this case was different because Division I football players generate “massive revenues” for their universities (Dawson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 7:23 pm by Damin J. Toell, Esq.
Personally, I don't see the Court of Appeals reconsidering the underlying rationale of Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y. v Maryland Cas. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:11 am by Diane Polscer
  Division II of the Court of Appeals, in dicta, suggested that this language did support a right of reimbursement. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) C, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2578 (04 November 2010) Qazi & Anor, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2579 (04 November 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) HHY Luxembourg Sarl & Anr v Barclays Bank Plc & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1248 (22 October 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Eurocall Ltd v Energis Communications Ltd & Anor [2010] EWHC 2790… [read post]