Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division Two" Results 61 - 80 of 5,299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
United Healthcare Services, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Aug. 4, 2016), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Two) held that UCL, FAL, and other claims brought on behalf of a putative class of members of a health care plan governed by the federal Medicare Advantage program (a Part C plan) were expressly preempted by the Medicare Act. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
June 13, 2012), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Two), in refusing to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement, said this:  Certainly, the injunctive relief claim under the Unfair Business Practices Act (Bus. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
In a recently-published opinion, another Division of the Court of Appeal (the Fourth Appellate District, Division One) disagreed with this part of Jolley. [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Holding that the controversy between Petitioner and PERB had been resolved as the result of PERB's issuing the determinations demanded by Petitioner, the Appellate Division dismissed PERB's appeal as moot.* See CPLR §5519[a][1], which, in pertinent part, provides for a stay of the enforcement of a court decision without a court order upon the filing of a notice of appeal or an affidavit of intention to move for permission to… [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Holding that the controversy between Petitioner and PERB had been resolved as the result of PERB's issuing the determinations demanded by Petitioner, the Appellate Division dismissed PERB's appeal as moot.* See CPLR §5519[a][1], which, in pertinent part, provides for a stay of the enforcement of a court decision without a court order upon the filing of a notice of appeal or an affidavit of intention to move for permission to… [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:39 pm
Anzalone The Appellate Division of the Superior Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow in two eminent domain cases, City of Long Branch v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:05 am
Our bad.The second, issued minutes later, in State Farm v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:12 am by Carolina Attorneys
Rieger contends that, although the court entered two separate judgments, one for each of the two separate charges, those judgments are STATE V. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:39 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In the meantime, the State is appealing this ruling, and my guess is the Appellate Division will resolve this issue very quickly. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:13 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
On her Twitter feed, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Elsa Alcala notes that she wrote dissenting opinions in two of the six petitions being considered in conference at SCOTUS today - Moore v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am by Gregory Forman
Katzburg comported with the protections the United States Supreme Court mandated in Turner v. [read post]