Search for: "State v. Crotty"
Results 61 - 80
of 373
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2011, 3:29 am
On the other hand, the more recent case People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 6:24 pm
In People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 10:32 am
Addressed in the context of a marihuana (marijuana) sale, In People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 4:11 am
According to a Manhattan Criminal Court Judge in People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
Stone, 2 Cir., 429 F.2d 138, 140; United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:53 am
People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:48 am
" In People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 10:01 am
Carey was put on notice more than once by Judge Paul Crotty of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to keep depositions to a minimum or sanctions would be in the offing. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:26 am
Is it enough for the prosecution to merely state the value? [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 2:20 am
In People v Consalvo, 89 NY2d 140 (1996), the Court of Appeals considered a trial court’s failure to hold such a hearing after it was requested by the defendant, as well as the lack of necessary evidence supporting the finding that the State of New York had had losses of at least $500,000 due to the defendant’s fraudulent Medicaid billing. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 2:20 am
In People v Consalvo, 89 NY2d 140 (1996), the Court of Appeals considered a trial court’s failure to hold such a hearing after it was requested by the defendant, as well as the lack of necessary evidence supporting the finding that the State of New York had had losses of at least $500,000 due to the defendant’s fraudulent Medicaid billing. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 11:01 am
In People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:56 am
See People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:52 am
” People v Cox, 286 N.Y. 137, 142 (1941). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
” Van Dyne-Crotty, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 1:59 am
In People v. [read post]
20 May 2017, 2:40 am
In People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:40 am
In People v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:56 am
People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:32 am
In applying the above "rules" to the facts of the case, the Court stated that because Harassment and Menacing are continuing offenses, see, People v. [read post]
