Search for: "State v. D. Knox" Results 61 - 80 of 91
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
The Court relisted for a second time in Knox v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:50 am by Susan Brenner
United States’ Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, U.S. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am by admin
Box 308 Elizabethtown, Illinois 62931-0308 Phone: 618/287-2735 Fax: 618/287-2713 Henderson Sandra D. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am by Carolyn Elefant
So rather than devote time and resources to attaining Fort Knox-like standards, lawyers should assess their risks and apply the appropriate level of security to a particular risk. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create… [read post]