Search for: "State v. D. S."
Results 61 - 80
of 43,216
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
Schwartz v Oshman & Mirisola, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31592(U) May 3, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155780/2023 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am
” People v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
United States, and Shoop v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The appeal must be dismissed.Respondent has, through board policy, “delegate[d] its authority to designate library materials to be used in the [d]istrict to the school library media specialist(s). [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The appeal must be dismissed.Respondent has, through board policy, “delegate[d] its authority to designate library materials to be used in the [d]istrict to the school library media specialist(s). [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:24 pm
Simplot Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:00 pm
You'd think they'd go for more traditional help-the-needy stuff. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:58 pm
Smith (Sigmund D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:01 am
United States Department of Agriculture’s Rural Utility Service (D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Vaseliou of the bar of the State of Texas, admitted pro hac vice of counsel), for Parents Defending Education, respondent.The New York Civil Liberties Union, New York (Stefanie D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Vaseliou of the bar of the State of Texas, admitted pro hac vice of counsel), for Parents Defending Education, respondent.The New York Civil Liberties Union, New York (Stefanie D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:00 am
”And since it wasn’t a covered event, the AD1 also didn’t think a timely disclaimer, pursuant to the state’s Insurance Law, applied.Now there’s no disclaiming that.# # #DECISIONW. v SRDCSM Inc. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Almost 30 years ago, SCOTUS issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:04 pm
July 8, 2022), aff’d, 66 F.4th 687 (7th Cir. 2023) [read post]
7 May 2024, 11:46 am
” Case No. 01001976380 | The People of the State of California v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
Cyrus D. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
In 1975, the Alaska Supreme Court decided that the state’s marijuana ban violated the state constitution’s right to privacy, following several other state courts that had reached the same conclusion under their own constitutions. [read post]