Search for: "State v. DISTRICT COURT OF FIRST JUDICIAL DIST."
Results 61 - 80
of 721
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:47 am
If so, please state when and where. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 2:07 pm
“The conciliation conference and counseling shall take place at the established court conciliation service of that judicial district or at any similar service or facility where no court conciliation service has been established. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:56 pm
Buena Vista Water Storage District v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
Dist., 2 F.4th 407, 413 (5th Cir. 2021) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm
The Southern District of New York stated in 2014 that search algorithms (agents) are written by humans. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm
The Southern District of New York stated in 2014 that search algorithms (agents) are written by humans. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 2:55 pm
Ocean Street Extension Neighborhood Assn. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:58 am
Thaler v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:59 am
The First District Court of Appeal agreed. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:29 am
In an opinion filed on December 29, 2021, and later ordered published on January 25, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed a judgment upholding the City of Newark’s (City) use of Government Code § 65457’s CEQA exemption for a 469-lot residential subdivision on land adjacent to San Francisco Bay. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
From a judicial standpoint, FOSTA’s terrible drafting has produced entirely predictable chaos in the courts. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:00 am
District Court’s Holding The Court first held that S&G Labs is a “laboratory” as defined by EKRA. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
District Judge Robert B. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 12:33 pm
The rationale for this position was first expressed in Level 3 Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 6:05 am
Dist. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Decided on December 15, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department CHERYL E. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Decided on December 15, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department CHERYL E. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Decided on December 15, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department CHERYL E. [read post]
