Search for: "State v. Degen" Results 61 - 80 of 252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Matter of Rosa v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. 2024 NY Slip Op 02538 Decided on May 8, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Matter of Rosa v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. 2024 NY Slip Op 02538 Decided on May 8, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:19 pm
"The fugitive disentitlement doctrine permits a court to dismiss an appeal if the party seeking relief is a fugitive while the matter is pending' (Degen v United States, 517 US 820, 824 [1996]; see Ortega-Rodriguez v United States, 507 US 234, 242 [1993]). [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 4:05 am by David DePaolo
Gammel in September 2010.Gammel opined that the cause of Potter's neck pain was a pre-existing and progressive degenerative cervical disc condition that was completely unrelated to her work. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 =============== Disability benefits for New York State and municipal employeesA 1098 page e-book focusing on administering the Retirement and Social Security Law, General Municipal Law Sections 207-a/207-c and similar laws providing disability benefits to employees of the State of New York and its political subdivisions. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 =============== Disability benefits for New York State and municipal employeesA 1098 page e-book focusing on administering the Retirement and Social Security Law, General Municipal Law Sections 207-a/207-c and similar laws providing disability benefits to employees of the State of New York and its political subdivisions. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:06 pm
In lengthy reasons for judgement released today by the BC Supreme Court (Peake v. [read post]