Search for: "State v. Deli" Results 61 - 80 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2019, 12:00 pm by Anthony Zaller
  As noted in the article by Alex Canter, of Canter’s Deli, the delivery services will likely look towards automation to make deliveries in the future. 3. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
The decision of the appeals court was reversed and the judgment of the circuit court was affirmed in part (State of Oregon v. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 10:37 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenesisolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:30 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 8:56 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:54 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
A claim for repeated trauma was established from the claimant’s use of a meat slicer while working in the employer’s deli. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am by Richard Hunt
Good Friendship Deli and  Tobacco Corp. et al, 2021 WL 5822232, (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:34 am
(Patently-O) Ninth Circuit affirms infringement finding against clothing maker: Quiksilver, Inc. v Kymsta Corp (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB affirms refusal to register, ruling DELI EXPRESS and SAN LUIS depicted ‘in such a manner that consumers would not perceive them as constituting a single composite mark’: In re E A Sween Company (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB: Extreme rareness of RENATI as surname leads to 2(e)(4) reversal: In re The House of Terrance… [read post]