Search for: "State v. Durham" Results 61 - 80 of 441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Although disclaiming any interest in the outcome of the claims underlying the dispute, NASAA filed a joint amicus brief with the North Carolina Secretary of State, arguing that the case’s foundational jurisdiction issues directly implicate the Secretary of State’s ability to enforce the North Carolina Securities Act (NNN Durham Office Portfolio 1, LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:36 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rudewicz, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 499 (24 April 2012) Godfrey, R (on the application of) v Southwark [2012] EWCA Civ 500 (24 April 2012) Westlb AG v Nomura Bank International Plc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 495 (24 April 2012) Lalli v Spirita Housing Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 497 (24 April 2012) Greenwich Community Law Centre, R (on the application of) v Greenwich… [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 3:05 pm by MacIsaac
Reasons for Judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Vernon Registry, (Donnelly v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Monday 30 January  2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm by KC Johnson
” Hobgood noted that the Supreme Court decisions cited by Cline’s attorneys regarding the First Amendment protections for public officials explicitly carved out an exception: that, as Garrison v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
Blackman, an assistant appellate public defender from Durham, N.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm by Rosalind English
 In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:37 pm by KC Johnson
But Hudson then went further, and held that Nifong violated a 1959 case called Napue v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
This symposium explores these and other issues.Keynote Lecture: James V Feinerman, Associate Dean for Transnational Programs, Co-Director, Georgetown Law Asia, and James M. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:43 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Appleby, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 926 (29 April 2010) Jones, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 925 (29 April 2010) Kazantzis, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 712 (16 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RW v SW [2010] EWCA Civ 457 (29 April 2010) Birmingham City Council v Clue [2010] EWCA Civ 460 (29 April 2010) McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ B1 (29 April 2010) Parker v Secretary of State for… [read post]