Search for: "State v. E. W. B." Results 61 - 80 of 2,177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am by Rob Robinson
Consideration should be given to, among other things: “(a) asset management; (b) access controls; (c) encryption; (d) communications security; (e) physical and environmental security; [and] (f) operations security. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
According to the SEC’s Rule 34-98738, which went into effect on Jan. 2, “[w]hile short selling can serve useful market purposes, such as facilitating price discovery, there are concerns that it could be used to drive down the price of a security, to accelerate a declining market in a security, or to manipulate stock prices. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
” Thaler’s reliance on the accession doctrine fails because “[w]e are not concerned here with a new item of tangible property produced by an existing item of tangible property. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" On the day that the Court's decision dropped, the President sent another letter lamenting the "difficult day" that "[w]e" "see" "as a step backwards. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:50 am by Brian Finucane
Despite these regular military actions, the Pentagon implausibly claims that “[w]e’re not in an armed conflict with the Houthis. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 10:53 am by Dennis Crouch
” Thaler’s reliance on the accession doctrine fails because “[w]e are not concerned here with a new item of tangible property produced by an existing item of tangible property. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]