Search for: "State v. Eady" Results 61 - 80 of 285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am by Kristiina Reed, Six Pump Court
James Eadie QC and Jonathan Hall QC appeared for Her Majesty’s Attorney General. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In these cases, which certainly include D and V, a proper criminal investigation by the state is required. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:10 am by Adam Wagner
Mr Justice Eady ruled against Dr Singh in May 2009 in relation to two important preliminary issues. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am by INFORRM
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In Wasserman v Freilich [2016] EWHC 312 (QB), Sir David Eady remarked at the end of his judgment that “an allegation of dishonesty, fraud or attempted fraud will usually fall fairly and squarely on the side of fact rather than opinion. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:12 am by Rosalind English
The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld Eady J’s judgment below. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Well known examples of those who can make such a defence are the proprietors of libraries (Vizetelly v Mudie’s Select Library Limited) and newsvendors (Emmens v Pott [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:28 am by INFORRM
Explaining the level of the award, Sir David Eady stated that the allegations were distinctive and very serious, going to the “core attributes” of the Claimant’s personality. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Ma v St George’s Healthcare Trust, heard 8-10 June 2015 (Sir David Eady) Lachaux v Independent Independent Print,&nb [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
In last month’s unanimous judgment in Rothschild v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2013] EWCA Civ 197) the Court of Appeal upheld a decision that the defence of justification had been established in a claim brought by the financier Nat Rothschild against the Daily Mail. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by NL
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by NL
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Shakil-Ur-Rahman v ARY Network Ltd [2016] EWHC 3110 (QB) (Sir David Eady) – the claimant succeeded and recovered damages of £185,000. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
Sir David Eady heard an application in Cartus v Siddell. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
  The Court was also unimpressed by the defendants’ point that other generally indicated facts were truly stated. [read post]