Search for: "State v. Eady" Results 61 - 80 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2016, 12:28 am by INFORRM
Explaining the level of the award, Sir David Eady stated that the allegations were distinctive and very serious, going to the “core attributes” of the Claimant’s personality. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
 There is no Parliamentary authorisation for the loss of rights in any legislation made by Parliament and, in the absence of this, the appeal should be dismissed. 14:27: Lord Reed suggests “life has moved on from the times of Dicey”. 14:23: Lord Carnworth asks a question about the ‘one-line’ bill which James Eadie QC suggested the government would introduce if it loses the appeal. 14:21: Dominic Chambers QC summarises that the outcome of the… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
In response James Eadie QC states that withdrawal need not be a joint effort but, if it must be, Parliament’s decision to pass the European Union Referendum Act 2015 is sufficient cooperation with the Government. 14.33: James Eadie QC states “The Government has the constitutional responsibility and ability… to make and ratify treaties. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
 The case was tried by Sir David Eady on 31 October to 4 November and 7 November 2016. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Shakil-Ur-Rahman v Ary Network Ltd & Anor,  heard 31 October to 4 November and 7 November 2016 (Sir David Eady) Otuo v Watchtower Bible and Tract Society 8 November 2016 (Chancellor, Gloster and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
On 3 November 2016, Sir David Eady gave judgment in the libel damages assessment of Undre v London Borough of Harrow ([2016] EWHC 2761 (QB)). [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 24 October 2016, Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of Shakil-ur-Rahman v ARY Network Ltd & anr On 25 October 2016, there was an application in the case of ABZ  v Lewisham London Borough Council,  before Warby J. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 17 October 2016, there was an assessment of damages in the case of Undre & anr v The London Borough of Harrow, before Sir David Eady. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
“Denial“, a film based on Deborah Lipstadt’s book of the 2000 libel trial, Irving v Penguin Books and Lipstadt (see Gray J’s judgment, [2000] EWHC 115 (QB))  has been released in the United States. [read post]
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady refused a number of applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady will hear applications in the case of David v Gabriel. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 8 July 2016, Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of Unnadkat v Patel. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
I agree – if Kennedy and Sullivan are anything to go by, the levels are not very high (especially by comparison with damages for defamation; see Mosley v News Group Newspapers [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) (24 July 2008) [212] (Eady J); though note also Representative Claimants v MGN Ltd [2016] 2 WLR 1217, [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 (17 December 2015)). [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Bailii has recently made available a judgment of 22 June 2016 in the case of Richardson v Google UK Ltd [2016] EWHC 1534 (QB)) in which Sir David Eady made an extended civil restraint order against the claimant. [read post]