Search for: "State v. Eder"
Results 61 - 80
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2008, 2:47 pm
NIXON, 543 U.S. 175 (2004); UNITED STATES v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Fund v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
Wiggins v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 7:27 am
" Aldana, 578 F.3d at 1293; Esfeld v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
The court undertook a state-by-state analysis of all 22 states – Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida (citing a case we sent to Westlaw), Georgia, Illinois (rejecting Dolin v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
” (Elonis v United States, 16). [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:06 pm
" United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:58 am
The Fifth Circuit did no better in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am
Yesterday the Court granted cert. in Chafin v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:05 am
After the third Buck's Fizz, members of the IPO's IP Policy Squad really do find Question 2(bb) hilariously funny A little behind (still) with his correspondence, this Kat has only just discovered the details of a new case which has been referred by the German Bundesgerichtshof to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling: It's case C-553/11 Bernhard Rintisch v Klaus Eder [could it be this Klaus Eder, in which case we may have… [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:20 pm
State legislators are being urged to find a way to correct inaccuracies in the registry. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 9:03 pm
McNary v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:09 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
. to comply with state law while also being in compliance with federal law”); Strayhorn v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:48 am
The Georgia Supreme Court order in Hill v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 11:51 am
” Hoffman v. [read post]
[Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz] Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review
9 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
” Accordingly, “[f]ederal courts may not ‘decide questions that cannot affect the rights of litigants in the case before them’ or give ‘opinion[s] advising what the law would be upon a hypothetical state of facts. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:43 am
U.S. v. [read post]
