Search for: "State v. Ege"
Results 61 - 80
of 466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2022, 1:55 am
However, it also states “the SCCs do not contain any requirement on how the signature should be formalised (eg, whether it can be done electronically). [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am
’ (2015) 7 Journal of Media Law 1, 21. [2] See, eg, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, art 19(3). [3] SPEECH Act s 3; United States Code, title 28, Part VI, § 4102. [read post]
11 May 2022, 6:44 am
On 26 April 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its long-awaited judgment in Poland v European Parliament and Council (C-401/19). [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:16 am
[See eg Gallet, Dreyer & Berkey, LLP v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
., Koch, A.G. and Møgelmose, V., 2022. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 11:01 am
The event was held at Penn State Law, State College, PA 15 March 2022. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:18 am
The Court found that the instance in question could be viewed as falling within the margin of appreciation accorded to member states: ‘the choice of the means calculated to secure compliance with article 8 of the Convention in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves is in principle a matter that falls within the contracting states’ margin of appreciation’, referencing the Grand Chamber in Bărbulescu v Romania ([125]). [read post]
The Slovak Constitutional Court on Risk Profiling and Automated Decision-Making by the Tax Authority
17 Dec 2021, 11:46 am
In their recent opinion on the Big Brother Watch and Others v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:13 am
(L 199) 40 (EC), art 1 (2) (f). [4] See eg Case C-212/97, Centros Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 1:54 pm
The case is Esparaza v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:59 am
Portions of the registered mark(s) (eg COLLEGE and I meaning INTERNET) is/are therefore relatively weak mark inherently. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
There were three consequences of this removal: first, Fortnite could not be downloaded to an Apple device; secondly, previously installed iOS versions of Fortnite could not be updated; and, thirdly, Apple device users could not play against players who had the latest version of Fortnite.[22] 4 The Proceedings On the same day as Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store, Epic commenced antitrust proceedings in the United States District Court… [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 1:05 am
Before considering those cases, it is important to note that there is no universal acceptance of the view that the current state of AI can conceive or can contribute to the conception of an invention. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:47 pm
This result is patently unfair, and courts have found a way to avoid it by concluding that, in order to be deductible, the debt must be one that is likely to be paid or recovered (see, eg, Livingstone v Livingstone (1980) 4 MPC 129 (NZHC)). [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:20 am
Voting served in part to ensure rewarding those who remained at least officially aligned with the core ideology (eg it is difficult for a socialist to win an election in the United States at least for the moment given the nature of US underlying ideologies of democracy and its ties to forms of economic organization). [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am
Senior judges have repeatedly noted the excesses of the Spiliada regime, in terms of the time, expense and judicial resource spent in litigating questions about the appropriate forum (see, most recently, Lord Briggs in Vedanta Resources Plc v Lungowe [2019] UKSC 20, [6]-[14]), yet they and the rule makers have done little or nothing about it. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:36 am
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:21 pm
Several legal commentators have called our attention to the poor state of PIL in Africa generally (Oppong, 2006; Okoli, 2019). [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Canada In the case of Zoutman v. [read post]
