Search for: "State v. Eli" Results 61 - 80 of 982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2019, 11:33 am by IPWatchdog
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation's petition to the Supreme Court in a case against Apple; AAG Makan Delrahim's remarks about misuse of antitrust law by U.S. courts; Eli Lilly's petition to the Supreme Court regarding functional claiming rule; cert granted in Allen v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:59 am by Walter Olson
More reactions to the Supreme Court’s 5-4 Brown v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. back to West Virginia state courts on Tuesday, September 9. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:34 pm
Without the question mark, that's Alaska's state motto.With the question mark, it's our title for a post analyzing the on-going trial in State of Alaska v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:24 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Art 57 states that an invention is susceptible of industrial application if it can be made or used in any kind of industry. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:49 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Political process theory, closely associated with the work of John Hart Ely and footnote four in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:00 pm
Professor Ely notes that, since World War II, few property disputes have sparked widespread public interest and debate like the United States Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Although there are good arguments against such an expansive reading of the investment protection standards, the Eli Lilly dispute against Canada shows that such challenges are not just a theoretical option.Yes: treaty shopping is this cuteThe nature of UPC decisions makes such challenges all the more likely:  As “court common to the Contracting Member States” and “part of their judicial system”, the UPC is – by virtue of the UPCA preamble –… [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York State Court of Appeals, citing Anderson v Eli Lilly & Co., 79 NY2d 797, said "the CVA, like other claim revival statutes, temporarily revived certain previously time[-]barred claims — it did not act to create any new causes of action".Click HERE to access the opinion of the Court of Appeals posted on the Internet. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York State Court of Appeals, citing Anderson v Eli Lilly & Co., 79 NY2d 797, said "the CVA, like other claim revival statutes, temporarily revived certain previously time[-]barred claims — it did not act to create any new causes of action".Click HERE to access the opinion of the Court of Appeals posted on the Internet. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:03 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Eli Lilly and Co., United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (2010-1105). [read post]