Search for: "State v. Emily J. Mays" Results 61 - 80 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
Ofcom states that if competition concerns are identified, it could lead to further action. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor)   New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist)   United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat)   United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney… [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 8 March 2021 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of COS v PER. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
In this piece for the Guardian, Emily Bell, professor of professional practice at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism and a Pulitzer juror 2011/2012, comments on the significance of the HuffPo win. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am by Dan Markel
  Plea bargaining drug cases for indigent defendants (co-author J. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm by centerforartlaw
Meanwhile, irrevocable trusts may not be revoked or amended. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
On 22 November 2017, Warby J handed down in judgment in the case of Candy v Holyoake (No.2) [2017] EWHC 2943 (QB). [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
Birmingham argued that Regulation 8 had not been made pursuant to s.203(2)(b), rather it was made pursuant to "the more general provision in section 203(1) of the Act, which stipulates that the Secretary of State may make provision by regulations as to the procedure to be followed in connection with a section 202 review. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
Birmingham argued that Regulation 8 had not been made pursuant to s.203(2)(b), rather it was made pursuant to "the more general provision in section 203(1) of the Act, which stipulates that the Secretary of State may make provision by regulations as to the procedure to be followed in connection with a section 202 review. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Danney, Comment, Sacking CEQA: how NFL stadium developers may have tackled the California Environmental Quality Act, 19 PENN STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW 131 (2011)Carolyn Davis, Note, Leave it on the field: too expansive approach to evaluating Title IX compliance in Biediger v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of WFZ v BBC [2024] EWHC 343 (KB). [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
[1]See, e.g., Lauren Lefer, Scientific American, “Your Personal Information Is Probably Being Used to Train Generative AI Models | Scientific American (October 2023); Congressional Research Service, “Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law” (2023), online at: LSB10922 (congress.gov) (“AI systems are “trained” to create literary, visual, and other artistic works by exposing the program to large amounts of data, which may include text,… [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:58 pm by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
Cardozo was born a twin (with sister, Emily) on May 24, 1870, to Jewish parents in New York City. [read post]