Search for: "State v. Emory"
Results 61 - 80
of 299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
John Witte, Emory University School of Law, has published Back to the Sources? [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:32 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Secretary of State of Georgia (Brennan Center). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm
Legal Fields, Public Spheres, and the Twin Challenges of State and Market. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:05 am
Perry, Obergefell v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:30 pm
Connecticut, Roe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Buhman and British Columbia’s Reference Re: Section 293, (Emory Law Journal, Vol. 64, p. 1815, 2015).Sarah Adams-Schoen, Land Use Law Update: Will Reed v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Twitter v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
A Dailge & Daniel V. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
, (49(1) Monash University Law Review (2023)).Dov Fox & Jill Wieber Lens, Texas Says a Fetus Is a Child, Except When a Parent Sues a Negligent Doctor or State Official, (Slate (online), August 23, 2023).Zainuddin Zainuddin, Salle Salle & Andi Risma, Balanced Justice in Islamic Inheritance to Realize Unity and Sustainability of Collective Life, (August 13, 2023).From SmartCILP:Wilson Huhn, Analysis of Carson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
., Oxford University Press 2015)).Michael John DeBoer, Legislating Morality Progressively -- The Contraceptive Coverage Mandate, Religious Freedom, and Public Health Policy and Ethics, (Journal of Law and Health, Vol. 28, p. 62, 2015).Doug Coulson, British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
Finally, in the midst of Chinese exclusion, the Supreme Court handed down the most significant citizenship case it ever decided, United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:46 am
Frank Alexander of Emory got to make some comments. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 8:50 am
Part IV describes the Supreme Court's decision in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Wright, After Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Hodges; DeBoer v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Jackson Women's Health Organization: Reckoning with its Impact and Charting a Path Forward, (University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2023).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:Berta Esperanza Hernandez-Truyol, Awakening the Law: Unmasking Free Exercise Exceptionalism, 72 Emory Law Journal 1061-1104 (2023).Karin Carmit Yefet & Ido Shahar, Divorced from Citizenship: Palestinian-Christian Women between the Church and the Jewish… [read post]
