Search for: "State v. Ervin"
Results 61 - 80
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2025, 2:15 am
– Meredith Ervine [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 4:22 pm
Selvin is a partner with Los Angeles-based Ervin Cohen & Jessup. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
– Meredith Ervine [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 pm
Justice Newby authored a dissent, joined by Justice Ervin, which would have concluded under State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm
In 1956, Ervin helped draft the Southern Manifesto denouncing Brown v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:15 pm
– Meredith Ervine [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 1:01 am
observing: Forty-five years after Brown v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 12:05 pm
Pliler and Davis v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 11:25 pm
In referring the question on Art 3(a) as to what was required for a product to be protected by a basic patent, he stated that he was “encouraged by what the [CJEU] said in Actavis v Sanofi and Actavis v Boehringer to believe that there is a realistic prospect of the Court providing further and better guidance to that which it has hitherto provided” (para 91). [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:47 am
State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 7:18 am
Alvarez & Seff v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:20 am
State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
, where the answer is basically because over 200 years of systematic opposition to the idiocy of that system has proved unavailing against the barriers of Article V, most dramatically in 1969, where the Senate, because of a filibuster led by white supremacists Southern senators Sam Ervin and Strom Thurmond, never voted on a proposal that had in fact gained the assent of two-thirds of the House of Representatives and perhaps would have gotten the two thirds had the Senate been… [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 3:15 am
– Meredith Ervine [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 3:15 am
– Meredith Ervine [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 3:15 am
– Meredith Ervine [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:16 pm
In State v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 3:30 am
” – Meredith Ervine [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
