Search for: "State v. Eure"
Results 61 - 80
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2011, 5:07 am
Subsequently Realchemie was ordered to pay a fine of EUR 20,000 for breach of that prohibition, plus further costs of EUR 898.60. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
This is what she writes:Defamation v Freedom of Expression: The ECHR Grand Chamber Hands Down Judgment in Delfi v EstoniaOn 16 July 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) handed down its much-awaited judgment in Delfi AS v Estonia. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:36 pm
ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY v MYRIAD GENETICS – an isolated decision? [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am
She was sentenced to pay a fine of EUR 480, or serve 60 days of imprisonment in the event of default. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm
Related posts:Canadian Case on State Immunity In Kazemi (Estate of) v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:06 pm
Damages of 25,500 EUR were awarded. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:02 am
However, Pihl sued the association and claimed symbolic damages of 1 Swedish krona (SEK), approximately 0.10 euro (EUR). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:12 am
The ECHR, in its judgment for Allée v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:59 am
State, 190 So.3d 94 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District2015) (“Smith v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:36 am
The court held that Turkey was to pay the applicant 7,500 euros (EUR) in respect of non pecuniary damage. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm
However, it would appear to be insufficient on the strength of this judgement for a Court to ignore new evidence at the warrant stage and to state, for example, that the main proportionality issues had been dealt with in the course of the possession claim.Jarnea and others v Romania (31/5/12)The applicants were owners of properties which had been let to tenants under agreements concluded with the State. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm
However, it would appear to be insufficient on the strength of this judgement for a Court to ignore new evidence at the warrant stage and to state, for example, that the main proportionality issues had been dealt with in the course of the possession claim.Jarnea and others v Romania (31/5/12)The applicants were owners of properties which had been let to tenants under agreements concluded with the State. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:00 am
The case of Assemblée Chrétienne Des Témoins de Jéhovah d’Anderlecht and Others v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:00 am
The case of Assemblée Chrétienne Des Témoins de Jéhovah d’Anderlecht and Others v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:34 pm
, United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:23 am
Second, the Paris Court sets forth that an anti-suit injunction by an EU member state against the courts of another member state would be contrary to public policy (ordre public), because of the "mutual trust in the judicial systems of EU member states" (see CJEU C-159/02 – Turner/Grovit). [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:31 am
TurkeyCASE OF SALDUZ v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:11 am
EUR 4.500 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, and to both applicants jointly EUR 15.000 for costs and expenses. [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:37 pm
The overall award ranged from EUR 58000 to 90000. [read post]
