Search for: "State v. Finn"
Results 61 - 80
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2013, 8:56 pm
The reader might miss Siems’s subtle acknowledgement later on (which he does not quite state directly) that Robertson’s opinion was vacated by the D.C. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:45 am
TEGELER v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:20 am
STALLMAN v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:50 am
Tenet, who oversaw the brutal interrogations, and Michael V. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:40 am
Reversed and Remanded.Case Name: STATE OF WYOMING, ex rel., WYOMING WORKERS’ SAFETY AND COMPENSATION DIVISION v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:40 am
KOCH v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 8:52 am
HOFFMAN, v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 8:53 am
Finn, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Brenda S. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
MANNING CONSTRUCTION v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:25 am
MANNING CONSTRUCTION v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Bill BuxtonMicrosoft ResearchOriginal: Jan. 12, 2007Version: March 2, 2012 Keywords / Search Terms Multi-touch, multitouch, input, interaction, touch screen, touch tablet, multi-finger input, multi-hand input, bi-manual input, two-handed input, multi-person input, interactive surfaces, soft machine, hand gesture, gesture recognition . [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:21 am
., v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:08 pm
State, ex rel., Wyo. [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:37 pm
STATE OF WYOMING ex rel. [read post]
5 May 2012, 4:29 pm
The appeal was heard by Finn, Emmett and Bennett JJ in mid March 2012 and judgment was given at the end of April 2012. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:03 am
Finn v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 5:46 am
In the 2006 case Garcetti v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
Also on the story is Carol Rosenberg at the Miami Herald and Peter Finn at the Post. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:00 pm
DE LAINE AND BRIGGS V. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
C- 310/60 Danske Svineproducenter v Justitsministeriet – reference to the European Court of Justice (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling on the Regulation laying down standards for the transportation by road of live vertebrates – read judgment Some people might disagree with the Appeal Court’s judgment that a life serving prisoner did not have a human right to more than thirty minutes’ daily exercise in the open air (see Matthew Finn’s post… [read post]
