Search for: "State v. Fly"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2007, 3:13 pm
The official transcript, which is available at this link, is much more to read than yesterday's habeas hullabaloo in Fly v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:19 pm
Early the morning of June 11, the crew of F/V FLYING OCEAN contacted Coast Guard Air Station Kodiak requesting medevac, stating that they had taken aboard the captain of F/V PROVIDENCE, who had suffered a hand injury near Chignik, Alaska, and that they were headed toward Kodiak. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
Gibson allegedly owns the mark FLYING V and the “Flying V Body Shape Design” and “Flying V Peg-Head Design. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 8:01 am
This time around, we have some en banc smackdowns on the issue of when you can sue the federal government over the religiously-motivated placement on the "no fly list"The case is Tanvir v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) transferred Ronald Chandler et. al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
It was also distinguishable from the use of private property for the purposes of collecting signatures for a petition (Appleby v United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, 6 May 2003) or the general prohibition on a ship entering the State’s territorial waters for campaigning purposes (Women on Waves v Portugal, no. 31276/05, 3 February 2009). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 8:13 am
IPNews® - Viacom International Inc. urged a Los Angeles judge to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Gibson Guitar Corp. for infringing a trademarked “Flying V” electric guitar, claiming that the allegedly infringing ukuleles were never sold in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:41 pm
US v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Link: Martinez v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 8:02 pm
Read the whole case, Flying J Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:14 pm
I will speak at Cooley at 3:30 PM, this time flying solo. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:21 pm
The Ninth Circuit (rightly) didn't feel like rewriting the order itself on the fly, and (rightly) didn't trust the non-binding interpretation of the order given by particular White House officials. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 9:12 am
E.M. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 1:03 pm
While Combs conceded that he was a recreational user, the Tenth District held the ODNR was not entitled to immunity because the injury from the flying rock, like the injury from the flying shrapnel in Ryll v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 5:30 pm
The Court today heard Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 7:18 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:12 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm
But the full impact of the justices' ruling in Skilling v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 7:21 am
And he cites Georgia Court of Appeals precedent, Kenerly v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
For example, in Guthrie v. [read post]
