Search for: "State v. Foley" Results 61 - 80 of 656
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2021, 2:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Gellert & Rodner v Gem Community Management, Inc., 20 AD3d 388 [2d Dept. 2005]; see also McGill v Goldman, 261 AD2d 593 [2d Dept. 1999]; Foley v Roche, supra). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 2:10 am by CMS
In this post, Richard Bamforth, Jessica Foley, and Julia Czaplinska-Pakowska of CMS comment on the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Kabab-Ji Sal (Lebanon) v Kout Food Group (Kuwait) [2021] UKSC 48, which delivered further guidance to commercial parties and arbitration practitioners on the issue of the governing law of arbitration agreements. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
Foley of the Foley Law Firm in Scranton for providing me with copies of the Fermin, Benedict, and Heisler cases. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 1:14 pm by Daniel F. Bernard
Employers are encouraged to speak with their Foley employment attorney to best ensure compliance with the act. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Second, my thanks to Jack Balkin and to the participants in this symposium:  Jack Rakove, Sandy Levinson, Franita Tolson, Ned Foley, and Jesse Wegman. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Protostorm, Inc. v Foley & Lardner LLP  2021 NY Slip Op 02227 Decided on April 08, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department the answer is yes. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah, who all work within the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down last week by the UK Supreme Court in the matter Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51, which has significant implications for the UK competition law collective proceedings (or class actions) regime. [read post]