Search for: "State v. Foy"
Results 61 - 80
of 196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2015, 3:19 am
This has been launched as part of the Hands Off FoI campaign. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:06 am
United States U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:26 am
In University of Connecticut v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm
United States, in which Justice Brandeis concurred, that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market” and in 1974, Justice Powell wrote in Gertz v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
Finally, the summary by Lewison J in Thompson v Foy was an accurate and helpful summary of the law, contra Link Lending's arguments. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
Finally, the summary by Lewison J in Thompson v Foy was an accurate and helpful summary of the law, contra Link Lending's arguments. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
(See: Hamilton, para. 37) The Applicant’s factum states, the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
Discusses the “populist wave directed at the European Court of Human Rights and European judges generally” resulting from the decision of the Supreme Court in R (F and FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 17 [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
R v Sargent, 2016 ABCA 104 [17] This Court has previously stated that smuggling drugs into a penal institution should be treated as an aggravating factor: R v Gargas, 2013 ABCA 245 (CanLII) at para 7. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 4:58 am
Sally Greene's already got State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
What harmony” Disharmony extends to one third of the Data Protection Regulation” – pointing out the degree of disagreement between Member States prior to the meeting. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am
Why is FOI being singled out? [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In this re-hearing of the Appellant’s appeal, the court had to decide whether the FOI request was lawfully denied. 5RB summa [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 11:51 am
Both the Information Commissioner and the Tribunal accept that names, work phone numbers and work e-mail addresses of staff members are personal data under the Data Protection Act, and therefore covered by the exemption in section 40 of the FOI Act. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
