Search for: "State v. Givens" Results 61 - 80 of 53,377
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:30 am by Jon Choi
Brooks and Gamage’s work is especially timely given that the Supreme Court will rule on Moore v. [read post]
This decision was brought to the Court as a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Carl v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
This choice will impact the severity of punishments that you are given, with indictment being the more severe of the two. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
This choice will impact the severity of punishments that you are given, with indictment being the more severe of the two. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:45 am by Keegan McBride
CHIPS Act limit China’s current access to state-of-the-art chips. [read post]
Instead, most states authorize the attorney general of the state to oversee and enforce charitable trusts. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm by Evan George
This unusual full-court press comes in the case of City & County of Honolulu v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:49 pm by Donald Dinnie
MEC for the Department of Health Free State Province v G.A.K obo M.A.K (2795/2015) [2024] ZAFSHC 142 (25 April 2024) (saflii.org) [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Given the number of groups (and states) eager to sue federal agencies, there is ample opportunity for mischief. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am by Guest Author
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 am by Tobin Admin
Accordingly, the Court of Appeals affirmed the state court’s grant of the motion on the claims against the police officer’s individual capacity as he was entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:51 am by Melissa Stewart
The Tribunal held that the obligation is one of “due diligence” and the standard “is stringent, given the high risks of serious and irreversible harm to the marine environment” from greenhouse gas emissions (para. 243). [read post]