Search for: "State v. Gupta "
Results 61 - 80
of 209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm
REPUBLICAN MULVANEY MONKEY-WRENCH GAMBIT MOVES TO DC COURT Below is the text of the complaint and request for instanter restraining order (TRO) filed by one of the dueling directors against the other [conversion from pdf]Original in pdf may be viewed ;here IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEANDRA ENGLISH, Deputy Director and Acting Director, Consumer Financial… [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm
REPUBLICAN MULVANEY MONKEY-WRENCH GAMBIT MOVES TO DC COURT Below is the text of the complaint and request for instanter restraining order (TRO) filed by one of the dueling directors against the other [conversion from pdf]Original in pdf may be view here ; IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEANDRA ENGLISH, Deputy Director and Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
” 5) The Race to the Bottom: SEC v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
Its initial answer to listed five cases including Gupta v British Broadcasting Corporation: In 2009, the BBC was ordered to pay damages to Suresh Gupta, after it broadcast a report that falsely accused him of being involved in money laundering. [read post]
2 May 2012, 1:32 pm
" [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:37 am
;See Fischer v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 7:18 pm
The petition of the day is: Gupta v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 9:38 am
State of Punjab and Ors. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 12:39 am
Respected academics like Robert Klonoff have stated it, and respected reporters like Perry Cooper have quoted respected plaintiffs’ counsel like Deepak Gupta to the same effect. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
First up is the class action case Tyson Foods v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:50 am
Sparkman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 3:07 am
After quoting the language of BCL § 1104 (c), Justice Masley’s decision cut to the chase, stating, “Gupta’s allegations do not meet the statutory requirements for dissolution because he fails to allege a division preventing the actual shareholders from electing directors. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:08 pm
This approach has been used in the United States on several occasions. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
ARELLANO V. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
ARELLANO V. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 8:10 am
In 2017, the Indian Supreme Court, in the case State Bank of India v Santosh Gupta, observed that even though Article 370 was labeled a “[t]emporary provision[]” and the Constituent Assembly had dissolved, the article “continue[s] to be in force” (¶12)—thus indicating it had attained permanent status. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
; The New York Court of Appeals will hear oral argument on this question on November 15 in Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
Similarly, in Gupta v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am
In Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith v. [read post]
