Search for: "State v. High" Results 61 - 80 of 35,148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Heller and [New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v.] [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
As a means of invading privacy, a photograph is particularly intrusive” (Douglas v Hello! [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”It is hard to counter that view when Justices like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito flaunt their political sympathies or when the Court trashed its own precedents on the way to overturning Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:12 pm by randywallace
Earlier today, the Mississippi Supreme Court released its opinion in Allen v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
More broadly, Thursday’s decision creates a high bar for plaintiffs in future racial gerrymandering cases to meet. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled on Tuesday against Bulgaria in Mandev and Others v Bulgaria, a case relating to unfair and unjustified forfeiture of assets as proceeds of crime and high court fees. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Only a smattering of Justice40 communities in the Golden State will see 48 or more health-threatening heat days under a moderate-emissions scenario, with additional communities appearing under a high-emissions scenario. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The stakes are high, because affected institutions and individuals that are deemed to render fiduciary advice will be subject to the highest duties of loyalty and care under U.S. law and strict prohibitions against specified transactions that present conflict of interest potential when dealing with ERISA-covered plans and IRAs. [read post]