Search for: "State v. Hoopes" Results 61 - 80 of 286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2018, 9:41 am by Eric Goldman
” The reference to “any” criminal law presumably covers both state and federal criminal law, unlike Section 230’s express exclusion only for federal criminal law (and the newly added state crime exclusions in FOSTA). [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:31 am by Hayley Evans, Shannon Togawa Mercer
As Chris Mirasola describes, the ECJ must jump through a number of hoops in adjudicating these eleven questions as a matter of EU law before the Irish High Court can proceed in Schrems 2.0. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Davis, which held that lawyers' ineffective work on state habeas proceedings did not excuse a procedural default because there's no constitutional right to counsel in state habeas proceedings. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:14 am
This is the interesting question that the US Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit recently addressed in Rentmeester v Nike. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Ultimately, the court says that lesser mental states do not support a finding of contributory liability. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:49 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
To give the casual ready a flavour of the kinds of mind-bending hoops a homelessness officer has to jump through I quote directly from Homelessness & Allocations on the subject of just one tiny aspect of family members of EEA nationals:- “In Singh and Others v. [read post]