Search for: "State v. Hussein"
Results 61 - 80
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2014, 5:03 am
In 2012, I blogged about the important decision of Hussein v The Labour Court [2012] IEHC 364. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
Ainsworth, Amicus Curiae Brief: Stormans, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:20 am
United States. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:00 am
C), and in federal court, al-Nashiri v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:45 am
Petitioner Abd Al Rahim Hussein Al Nashiri (“the accused” or “Petitioner”) was arrested in 2002 in Dubai and has been held as a prisoner in Guantanamo Bay by the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:56 am
From its opening: Abd Al Rahim Hussein Al-Nashiri is a noncitizen “enemy combatant” undergoing proceedings before a military commission at the United States Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm
A chemical weapons bomb, as it happens, dropped by Saddam Hussein’s forces on a Kurdish village during the genocidal Anfal campaign of 1987-88 that ravaged Iraqi Kurdistan. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:34 pm
They cite People v Hussein holding that each count is evaluated separately for speedy trial time as well as People v Minor and People v Clinton, cases permitting partial readiness. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
Circuit turned to this question, in the case of Hentif v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
Circuit: whether Guantanamo detainee Fadel Hussein Saleh Hentif’s appeal was filed on time. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
The post Case Preview: Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:31 am
Painter (1950) and Brown v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:12 am
Now available in redacted form: the government’s opposition brief and the defendant’s reply in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court was set to hear oral arguments in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court was set to hear oral arguments in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
” The United States pounced. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:52 am
Lord Devlin in Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) defined it by saying: ‘suspicion in its ordinary meaning is a state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking; ‘I suspect but I cannot prove’…suspicion can take into account matters that could not be put in evidence at all. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:52 am
Lord Devlin in Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) defined it by saying: ‘suspicion in its ordinary meaning is a state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking; ‘I suspect but I cannot prove’…suspicion can take into account matters that could not be put in evidence at all. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:52 am
Lord Devlin in Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) defined it by saying: ‘suspicion in its ordinary meaning is a state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking; ‘I suspect but I cannot prove’…suspicion can take into account matters that could not be put in evidence at all. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am
As you can see, John has a talent that has not been dampened by Sandy, and it also refuses to be completely buried even under the weight of unfortunately necessary sentences like this one: The petition argues that the lower court’s decision conflicts with the “curtilage” rule from United States v. [read post]
